Mooney#16 said:
Just to begin with I'm on neither side of the fence and am a hockey man first and Devils fan ipart time. Whether people want to admit it or not alot of bile has been spoken about Brent and alot of it is based on rumour, supposition and hear say. The fact is you cannot deny the man is qualified on paper to do the job. He has all the pieces of paper. He has served an apprenticeship within junior hockey and is an ex player of some quality having been drafted to the NHL and played in the IHL, AHL and ISL winning championships along the way. Those are facts not topic for debate to be demeaned.
I would agree a lot of on rumour, supposition and hear say surround Brent Pope. with little evidence to back it up. That is a whole other subject, one thing I have steered clear of. I would say is mud sticks regardless of if it is just or not.
Darnel and Hicks are qualified to officiate and experienced, they even get invited to IIHF games. Do we debate standards of officiating in this league, particularly regarding the above or do we say everything is rosy?
Mooney#16 said:
Now I'm not saying that corresponds to being any good at the job but again that is all supposition. At this stage you genuinely have no way of knowing if he can coach at this level ot not.
I would say not, leaving the team during season to do another job is going to affect your ability to coach. Being the MD during the off season and what that entails securing sponsorship, driving season ticket sales etc. is going to impact his ability to carry out a coaching role during that time.
Mooney#16 said:
The fact is and not many have said otherwise the way G was treated was inexcusable. He wasn't in my opinion given the opportunity he deserved to move to the bench and was then manipulated out of the door very unprofessionally.
Not to mention the lack of foresight of what the fallout would be removing the coach part way through a season.
Mooney#16 said:
But be under no illusions. G was not a coaching mastermind himself be it tactics or recruitment. It is romantic to think otherwise. He was however still young in his coaching career and more importatantly learning the trade. Would he have improved moving to the bench. I think so. Will he improve moving to another club coaching and not playing. Almost definately.
But Ragan and Pope had no right to treat G how they did but they did have every right to hold him to account and if they didn't like what they saw replace him. Thats the rub of the green in any vocational walk of life so no reason hockey should be any different.
Completely agree, but would add with G the team punched above its weight under very challenging conditions.
Mooney#16 said:
Ragan at the end of the day has £ signs behind his opinion so everyone just has to live with the fact his carries more weight no matter how wrong it might be.
Everyone of us puts time and money into the Devils, weather it be the casual fan that turns up 2 or 3 times a year, the nutter that drives thousands of miles each season, the folks that give up time to run RAT the guys that run SOHB. While no doubt Ragan puts more in that anyone else that doesn't mean we should sit in silence or agree implicitly when the ENL is about to sent to its grave, the structure of SOHB is going to be changed. Or any other change that will impact the organisation such as having the MD be the Coach going forward. If we do there is a danger that the Devils will be paraded in the emperors new clothes.
Mooney#16 said:
But going forward I would argue those being highly out spoken under the umbrella of passion for the club are underestimating the impact there actions also have on securing the Devils future.Will the Devils struggle to get players going forward. No chance. Will they retain current guys. Maybe not but new guys without baggage and political agenda will be more than happy to play here. They will know no different. These are pros with 10 year careers maybe. You don't turn down pay cheques. As far as I can tell and as long as it continues, the way the LaCosta injury has been handled would do more to secure a players signature than any coaching change mid season. Was it a shambolic and damaging time for the Devils. Yes. Are they coming out of it in better or worse state. Only time will give you the true answer to that question not passionate debate in its immediate aftermath.
I would argue it is better to get this out in the open now, than have to drag it up again in 6, 12 18 months time. Its not if we will get players under Pope that bothers me, its what players we get. You question if we will come through this in a better or worse state, and your opinion right now is only time will tell. Is it so wrong to speak up now to encourage debate and hopefully ensure outcome will be a positive one?
The way we have stood by injured players in both this and seasons past under Ragans ownership has impressed me, long may it continue. I also be quite happy for DLC to take a coaching role for the D & NM beyond this season working with the likes of Ben Bowns and Adam Goss but that is a whole other subject and I doubt if we would have the finances and influence to follow that through.