Gazza, what I have failed to cover in that post is that Coventrys penalties were dished out on the night and are therefore deemed to have been dealt with. If the further scrutiny that the league have alluded to result in bans for one or two Blaze players all well and good but as far as the game and the league rules go, Kirkham has probably come to the right conclusions. This doesn't mean I think Coventry are blameless, far from it, but this week has seen people slagging off Olson for chinning a spectator who lunges at him (reasonable reaction in my eyes), people slagging off the echo for putting us on the front page (the brawl in itself wouldn't have registered as news, it was only when said spectator had his brain fart that it did), now people are slagging of the league for going by the book on the penalties on the night to bans ratio. I can see that on the surface it looks like we have been hard done by but if you take a rational and less emotive view of it (as if through the eyes of a neutral say) it seems that it has been called pretty fairly.