osh said:
It could be done though and without too much difficulty really. For example, someone could represent each separate identity ( CDSL, The Inferno, Red Army etc etc) they in turn could receive their suggestions from their group and pass them on for discussion at a bi monthly meeting with Mr Ragan.
Paul, I'm trying hard to be constructive here, so, there would be absolutely no hidden or secret identities involved ( how could there be if you were meeting in a group and face to face with Mr Ragan?) I know you would wish to know the identity of every one who posts on here, that's just not going to happen, get over it. Anyone elected could in fact be identified in the programme so as we would all know who to preach with our respective ideas. It's just an idea I think is worth considering.
If you read my response you will see I didn't disagree with the idea or its validity, what I said is that even that reasonable suggestion would result in a row. And gave an example of how something reasonable did exactly that previously.
I don't actually need to know the identities of every person on here at all. I know all the folk I wish to know that post here already. You know my stance on the username only scenario. The character of Will McAvoy in Aaron Sorkin's latest show 'The Newsroom' said this about comments on his own forum: 'Anonymity is cowardice'
Simple fact is that there are not, CDSL aside, any elected persons to represent the groups you mention and therefore the fans chosen would be done personally by Club personnel, and that will cause issues for some. Not saying it's right but there it is. Even when forums are arranged only a small percentage attend, and some say a vote there on certain issues wouldn't be fair as they couldn't make it.
It's a very imperfect world in terms of policy change if opinions are looking to be canvassed.
What is needed is not necessarily a panel or a quorum. What is needed is a clear decision making process, with reasons if needed explained, and then crystal clear communication about them. The latest update does a good job in some areas and has raised sensitive questions in others. Hopefully, as I said previously, this will improve in both frequency and clarity and the issues will recede.
Still an optimist after 20+ years of Devils hockey. Clearly something wrong there