Helen that's a good post. I know you don't need me to tell you that either
I think it is right when people say there have been some darker sides to out fanbase emerging. However I would suggest that has happened to both those criticising the management and those who are critical of them.
For example - when Paul Ragan called a group of us 'militia' it was pretty much widely seen as a gaff, and poor judgement. Yet in this thread alone the same fans have been called 'Mafia' by a moderator and 'fans' (granted I am inferring you to mean those of us who have been outspoken and apologies if you did not) by yourself.
Whilst not the owners of the Club, that to me is no less disrespectful simply because we share opposing views, or outlooks on how to express them and highlight the need for change (of ownership or the style of it) on a Devils forum.
It's interesting that throughout the recent ineptitude (G saga, name-calling, the whole 'FACT' episode), there has been an element of the outspoken and angry supporters being seen as 'wrong'. It's not as simple as that really, but to gloss over the recent events, added to many additional ones where sponsors have been mistreated or lost, simply because one might be nervous of losing this brand of hockey is, for my money alone, wholly the wrong reasons to 'support the team'.
I completely respect everyone's position, I have never tried to get anyone else to say or comment anything from my viewpoint in this, and I understand that other supporters may not agree. However there is a laundry list of problems, growing almost daily, whereas on the other side we see one common argument, and it really does get distilled into the philosophy of a lot of PR's twitter activity:
'Real' fans wouldn't behave as I have.
Poppycock. Tell that to the MK Dons. Tell that to the people who raised the larger part of the £70k that the players were owed by Bob Phillips. That was done, and began by, noticing the cracks; the errors, the erratic and manic behaviours and the total disrespect for our Club and it's reputation. Not something that was done lightly then, or now.
If as PR has suggested there are only 20 who disagree with him then everyone can just tune out the noise and be happy that the 'Real' fans will be packing out the BBT like they did against Hull last Thursday.
Or we could accept that those on here, and indeed Twitter, do not represent the whole fanbase, however indicative, yet see the effect of the current regime's acts played out on the official attendance.
People are, and have been voting with their feet. Like hell do I think it's because of what I say on twitter or what, with respect, Jody says on here. They are intelligent fans who have made their own minds up to not buy a ticket or, in some extreme cases, cancel the ST they already have.
That is a massive judgement call, and I defy anyone to call, for example, Mandy Bates out for not being a 'Real' fan.
This doesn't have to come down to fan vs fan, however opposed the views are on this matter. And please don't take this post as being aimed in any way at you personally, I just picked up on that one aspect of your post to begin.
Those of us who are opposed to the way Brent and Paul are managing the club are no more some rabid militia than those who choose to support them are mindless drones without the ability to make their own decisions. It is only the Clubs style of communication that positions us in such a manner.
Just because you love something doesn't mean you can't be critical of it. Especially when 'it' is bigger than any of us, any owner or MD, Coach or anyone else. There is a common misconception that I often see repeated. That this is about Paul or Brent. No. It's about the Cardiff Devils, and what they are doing to that name.
Our views on that don't warrant marginalisation as a militant group any more than anyone else's views should have them labelled as 'happy clappers'. This is a subtle and complex situation with nuance and layers. It's not simply 'right' and 'wrong'.
As for the OP's question - I wholeheartedly agree with you that enough is enough. But not the difference of opinions - the decisions that have brought us here. Nothing in our recent history indicates things will be any better in the future, We have devolved as an organisation in this Calendar year at an alarming rate.
Sorry for the long post.