Thread starter
#1
Following on from the complete plank that slated Bownsey after the Coventry loss and the subsequent forum fall out,I have a suggestion and was wondering if this was workable?
In future if Poster A thinks Player X has not had a great game, strech of games, isn’t putting in the effort etc etc then instead of Poster A just slating player X, Poster A must state his / her reasoning then also put it out as a poll.
If the aforementioned isn’t undertaken then the mods can freely delete the post without question (categorised as unqualified judgment).
So the upshot could be - a shift in forum behaviour (which admittedly might take a little time to bed in) coupled with the addition of the mandatory poll to subsequently Understand consensus with Poster A’s opinion.
Probably not a perfect solution, but any thoughts / suggestions ?
In future if Poster A thinks Player X has not had a great game, strech of games, isn’t putting in the effort etc etc then instead of Poster A just slating player X, Poster A must state his / her reasoning then also put it out as a poll.
If the aforementioned isn’t undertaken then the mods can freely delete the post without question (categorised as unqualified judgment).
So the upshot could be - a shift in forum behaviour (which admittedly might take a little time to bed in) coupled with the addition of the mandatory poll to subsequently Understand consensus with Poster A’s opinion.
Probably not a perfect solution, but any thoughts / suggestions ?
Last edited: