Sliput said:
He/they are not dismissing the CDRA at all. It is a standard answer. They are not dealing with this in the public eye, thats how any business would reply and as James has posted, it might be what has been advised.
Actually I think he has dismissed them. He can't have it both ways:
Last season communications were issued saying that if anyone had any issues or complaints they should take it up with 'the appropriate CDRA representative'. (How on earth these guys were supposed to handle the Club's complaints in their supporting role was not made clear - another throwing of them under the bus).
Then Ragan was more than happy to use them to gather, officially mind you, feedback about the reasons for the 'outside' protest and issue official Club replies (which included blatant lies) via the CDRA website.
Now they have quite correctly, and within fair procedure and proper channels, withdrawn support, he is casually ignoring their existence.
He wants the penny and the bun. Problem is he has no penny and the bun, which was on credit, has been repossessed.