Emmerson ban

Sheincar

Well-Known Member
Thread starter #41
danhall76 said:
The ban seemed to be more a punishment for the lack of footage than the hit though. That was the joke. How could you possibly give a 2 min pen in the game and then extend it to 10 games with nothing to review? It's unbelievable!! 3 games is still ridiculous, on what planet can a player get punished for the club's issues?
3 game ban "fits" with time served. Having sat out 3 games how would a ban of say 1 game work when he'd already missed more than that.
 
#42
Sheincar said:
danhall76 said:
The ban seemed to be more a punishment for the lack of footage than the hit though. That was the joke. How could you possibly give a 2 min pen in the game and then extend it to 10 games with nothing to review? It's unbelievable!! 3 games is still ridiculous, on what planet can a player get punished for the club's issues?
3 game ban "fits" with time served. Having sat out 3 games how would a ban of say 1 game work when he'd already missed more than that.
I suppose they would have to reduce the fine to the club to compensate, and that wouldn't happen, its all about the money
 

Sheincar

Well-Known Member
Thread starter #44
jodysstillagirlsname said:
Sheincar said:
danhall76 said:
The ban seemed to be more a punishment for the lack of footage than the hit though. That was the joke. How could you possibly give a 2 min pen in the game and then extend it to 10 games with nothing to review? It's unbelievable!! 3 games is still ridiculous, on what planet can a player get punished for the club's issues?
3 game ban "fits" with time served. Having sat out 3 games how would a ban of say 1 game work when he'd already missed more than that.
I suppose they would have to reduce the fine to the club to compensate, and that wouldn't happen, its all about the money
Wash your mouth out with soap! How dare you suggest such a thing :lol:
 
#45
Emmersen should have sought an injunction setting aside the ban claiming restraint of trade.

Sadly its the only way to combat the sorry state ice hockey administration has plunged to in the EIHL.
 

Wannabe2

Well-Known Member
#46
Nott Simpson said:
Emmersen should have sought an injunction setting aside the ban claiming restraint of trade.

Sadly its the only way to combat the sorry state ice hockey administration has plunged to in the EIHL.
Emmerson should have got you to represent him OJ. ;)
 

Sheincar

Well-Known Member
Thread starter #47
Nott Simpson said:
Emmersen should have sought an injunction setting aside the ban claiming restraint of trade.

Sadly its the only way to combat the sorry state ice hockey administration has plunged to in the EIHL.
Does that still apply if he's being paid whilst banned?
 
#48
Sheincar said:
danhall76 said:
The ban seemed to be more a punishment for the lack of footage than the hit though. That was the joke. How could you possibly give a 2 min pen in the game and then extend it to 10 games with nothing to review? It's unbelievable!! 3 games is still ridiculous, on what planet can a player get punished for the club's issues?
3 game ban "fits" with time served. Having sat out 3 games how would a ban of say 1 game work when he'd already missed more than that.
It's still the player that has been punished. I understand he already served 3 but he should have been banned at all!! Insanity.
 
Top