I’m just lost for words and thoughts on that decision…
I mean as a logo - it’s ok - bland, generic and quite ‘corporate’ looking. But of all the things to change - I would have said the logo and brand we already had was strong.
i can understand why the wanted a re fresh it’s become a common theme for sports teams to go with a simpler looking logo (Man City, Juventus and Seattle Kraken being a few off the top of my head) but they got it all wrong with this.
As I stated in an earlier post, it will be interesting to see if anyone will buy a shirt at the auction. Dilemma! Buy it for the name knowing the logo sucks!! Hmmm
My favourite logo has always been the original green diamond, I even have it as a tattoo.
Personally I hate the "straining on the bog" logo, it is a mess and I have been waiting a long time for a change.
This new logo is big improvement.
What an absolute disaster that logo and launch has been!
Could understand if fans were asking for change but if it ain’t broke…
My daughter has a wall full of jerseys, says she won’t be asking for a new one this season.
I normally buy the odd hat or Tee but given it looks like a child has drawn it I won’t be buying anymore.
I’d like to know the reasoning behind it.
Massively dropped the ball.