The problem with the leave campaign most seem to have missed, is the fact the govt in power where on the side of remain, therefore leave campaign could not promise anything.
The next Prime Minister will need to be a leave supporter, otherwise, it's possible a remain supporter could in 3 months become Prime Minister and suggest the best interest for the UK is to remain in the EU.
The referendum is not legally binding, until article 50 is endorsed the result of the referendum can be ignored. This move by Cameron could be an attempt to delay, in the hope that the economy could show signs of going into melt down, to force opinion change, forcing the leave campaign to admit they got it wrong.
People are already admitting their vote would have been different had the current situation been realised.
The next Prime Minister will need to be a leave supporter, otherwise, it's possible a remain supporter could in 3 months become Prime Minister and suggest the best interest for the UK is to remain in the EU.
The referendum is not legally binding, until article 50 is endorsed the result of the referendum can be ignored. This move by Cameron could be an attempt to delay, in the hope that the economy could show signs of going into melt down, to force opinion change, forcing the leave campaign to admit they got it wrong.
People are already admitting their vote would have been different had the current situation been realised.