Thread starter
#1
Right, I appreciate that the NIHL is somewhat of a less skillfully league than the EIHL and I have taken that into account and looked at various younger and older hockey players in that league that are comparable to some of the players in our league.
I have also taken into account that whilst with us Herrman played 7 games with 0 points. However, was this due to limited ice time, confidence or just needing time to adjust to the pace of the league since it was technically his first outing as a professional.
BUT looking at and taking all of this into account I can't help but notice how much of an impact Rory Herrman is making for Telford. He is ripping apart the numbers of some of our ex players whom are admittedly aging but still capable in that league and also experienced such as Birbrear, Silverthorn etc.
Infact if you look at Telfords all time top scorers, all time points leaders and various other awards he is statistically well up there and I think is 2nd for all time points per game at the moment (based on how many games played). And he has very quickly become a fan favourite for his physical play.
Soooo...... Did we release him to early, should we have given him more ice time or more of a settling period OR have we made an agreement with him and Telford to gain some valuable Ice time and experience and come back to us at a later date.
Should we have kept him a little longer? And who would like to see him back? I personally think we should have kept him and built on our younger guys (Like Brandt) that will learn how loyal and dedicated this club is and will want to repay the clubs loyalty be staying for many seasons knowing that the club is building for the future. They may not be tearing up the league just yet but they are on lower wages and the heart they would play with over the years would be what the club always promotes and the more skillful players who then demand the higher wages could also be brought in to do the job(s) their wage pays them to do.
I have also taken into account that whilst with us Herrman played 7 games with 0 points. However, was this due to limited ice time, confidence or just needing time to adjust to the pace of the league since it was technically his first outing as a professional.
BUT looking at and taking all of this into account I can't help but notice how much of an impact Rory Herrman is making for Telford. He is ripping apart the numbers of some of our ex players whom are admittedly aging but still capable in that league and also experienced such as Birbrear, Silverthorn etc.
Infact if you look at Telfords all time top scorers, all time points leaders and various other awards he is statistically well up there and I think is 2nd for all time points per game at the moment (based on how many games played). And he has very quickly become a fan favourite for his physical play.
Soooo...... Did we release him to early, should we have given him more ice time or more of a settling period OR have we made an agreement with him and Telford to gain some valuable Ice time and experience and come back to us at a later date.
Should we have kept him a little longer? And who would like to see him back? I personally think we should have kept him and built on our younger guys (Like Brandt) that will learn how loyal and dedicated this club is and will want to repay the clubs loyalty be staying for many seasons knowing that the club is building for the future. They may not be tearing up the league just yet but they are on lower wages and the heart they would play with over the years would be what the club always promotes and the more skillful players who then demand the higher wages could also be brought in to do the job(s) their wage pays them to do.
Attachments
-
306.5 KB Views: 60