I too am amazed the Haddard "hit" was put in front of the review panel.
How anyone watching that game on Sunday thought there was anything worth reviewing on that play must be mad!
Notwithstanding the above, I do like these reviews and the explanations behind them. A step in the right direction.
Personally I don't really care about the spelling errors. As long as the decision is clarified I am happy enough. (Although does make the EIHL look a bit daft..little bit of extra effort by them before posting is all that is required)
The Cage seems to suggest that given spelling and bad grammar you can't take these reviews seriously? Guess the video evidence doesn't count if you can't spell properly then?
Now please...let's have a review system for the officials!