Marsh-One game ban

[Sliput]

http://www.eliteleague.co.uk/bans-for-m ... ha-p195254

Player: Tyson Marsh
Number: 22
Team: Cardiff Devils

During the game Cardiff Devils v Belfast Giants on 07/12/2014, The Department of Player Safety has automatically reviewed the major (5) + game misconduct that Marsh received at 19:47 in the third period for boarding.

The Department of Player Safety has reviewed this incident and has come to the following conclusions...

• The penalty called on the ice has been amended to a major (5) + game misconduct for checking from behind.
• The hit is a check from behind which is both dangerous and reckless, with no regard for the opposition player’s safety.
• The opposition player is in a vulnerable position on the ice along the boards.
• The contact of the hit is directly in the back with the opposition player’s numbers clearly visible and the opposition player makes no sudden movement prior to Marsh delivering the hit.
• The hit is avoidable and the onus is on Marsh delivering the check to not hit an opposition player in such a manner.

The Department of Player Safety has suspended Marsh for one (1) game.

 

[Have Hope#35]

http://www.eliteleague.co.uk/bans-for-marsh-pacha-p195254

Player: Tyson Marsh
Number: 22
Team: Cardiff Devils

During the game Cardiff Devils v Belfast Giants on 07/12/2014, The Department of Player Safety has automatically reviewed the major (5) + game misconduct that Marsh received at 19:47 in the third period for boarding.

The Department of Player Safety has reviewed this incident and has come to the following conclusions...

• The penalty called on the ice has been amended to a major (5) + game misconduct for checking from behind.
• The hit is a check from behind which is both dangerous and reckless, with no regard for the opposition player’s safety.
• The opposition player is in a vulnerable position on the ice along the boards.
• The contact of the hit is directly in the back with the opposition player’s numbers clearly visible and the opposition player makes no sudden movement prior to Marsh delivering the hit.
• The hit is avoidable and the onus is on Marsh delivering the check to not hit an opposition player in such a manner.

The Department of Player Safety has suspended Marsh for one (1) game.

Tony Smith was always going to make sure that he was back to help us take points off Braehead for them :lol:

 

[drummer-sean]

Worded awfully

The penalty called on the ice has been amended to a major (5) + game misconduct for checking from behind.

If it's still only a game, surely Marsh is cleared to play on Friday? It hasn't been changed to a match penalty.

Either way, I think he's lucky.

 

[Have Hope#35]

Worded awfully

The penalty called on the ice has been amended to a major (5) + game misconduct for checking from behind.

If it's still only a game, surely Marsh is cleared to play on Friday? It hasn't been changed to a match penalty.

Either way, I think he's lucky.

Maybe DOPS have taken Lloyd's reputation into consideration!?

 

[drainage]

Worded awfully

The penalty called on the ice has been amended to a major (5) + game misconduct for checking from behind.

If it's still only a game, surely Marsh is cleared to play on Friday? It hasn't been changed to a match penalty.

Either way, I think he's lucky.

He's suspended for one game .....won't play on Fri

 

[Have Hope#35]

Worded awfully

The penalty called on the ice has been amended to a major (5) + game misconduct for checking from behind.

If it's still only a game, surely Marsh is cleared to play on Friday? It hasn't been changed to a match penalty.

Either way, I think he's lucky.

He's suspended for one game .....won't play on Fri

It's just that the article on the Elite League website reads like this:
The penalty called on the ice has been amended to a major (5) + game misconduct for checking from behind.

instead of this:
The penalty called on the ice has been amended to a major (5) + match misconduct for checking from behind.
Unless of course the suspension differs in some way to a Match Penalty! Was it Boarding previously perhaps?

 

[ASHIPP]

Tyson will at least be back for Devils' massive game against Braehead.

On Friday Steelers will be missing Latulippe (has left) and Bois still recovering from a knock.
In the body numbers game we have to be thankful for small mercies.

 

[cupcake]

yeah was called as Boarding on Sunday

 

[Skippy]

Tyson will at least be back for Devils' massive game against Braehead.

On Friday Steelers will be missing Latulippe (has left) and Bois still recovering from a knock.
In the body numbers game we have to be thankful for small mercies.

Think Bois is back isn't he ?

 

[Have Hope#35]

Tyson will at least be back for Devils' massive game against Braehead.

On Friday Steelers will be missing Latulippe (has left) and Bois still recovering from a knock.
In the body numbers game we have to be thankful for small mercies.

Think Bois is back isn't he ?

He didn't feature on the Weekend and wasn't in the line-up?

 

[drummer-sean]

Worded awfully

The penalty called on the ice has been amended to a major (5) + game misconduct for checking from behind.

If it's still only a game, surely Marsh is cleared to play on Friday? It hasn't been changed to a match penalty.

Either way, I think he's lucky.

He's suspended for one game .....won't play on Fri

Understood that Hel, but that would be a MATCH penalty ;-)

It's just that the article on the Elite League website reads like this:
The penalty called on the ice has been amended to a major (5) + game misconduct for checking from behind.

instead of this:
The penalty called on the ice has been amended to a major (5) + match misconduct for checking from behind.
Unless of course the suspension differs in some way to a Match Penalty! Was it Boarding previously perhaps?

Exactly. Strangely worded.

 

[Sliput]

I think the 5+game will go on Tysons record and will not contribute to points (If they still do that).

Tha match ban given is something outside of the boundry of 'during the game'.

I think

 

[DevilDom]

Can't argue with the ban in fact in light of other similar incidents this year it is probably (dare I say it) a little lenient.

 

[shoes_off]

Poor Lloyd. Such a nice chap too. Really hope he's ok.

 

[danhall76]

Sarcasm's the lowest form of wit [emoji6] haha

I can accept the ban and be glad that it's not a few more!!

 

[phil PLT]

Why aren't all you nasty Devils fans complaining about the DOPS like Whereswally said would happen :roll:

 

[Soundwave1]

Not a lot of difference between this and Lloyd's hit on Hotham earlier this season which got 1 game. Seems pretty consistent in that regard :Banana

 

[drainage]

Why aren't all you nasty Devils fans complaining about the DOPS like Whereswally said would happen :roll:

Mainly cos we are rational and sane!

 

[James]

Why aren't all you nasty Devils fans complaining about the DOPS like Whereswally said would happen :roll:

Because it was worth every second?

 

[phil PLT]

Why aren't all you nasty Devils fans complaining about the DOPS like Whereswally said would happen :roll:

Because it was worth every second?

Couldn't agree more James :lol: