Thread starter
#1
Is this hit worth a 3 match ban ?
- Thread starter devils2001uk
- Start date
Is this hit worth a 3 match ban? Definitely not IMHO - it appears to be a well timed hip check.
Yes Peacock may have got injured, but this is a physical sport, people do get injured from time to time - Man up!!
Trouble is the league rely on a one man disciplinary committee - Amazing how conveniently the disciplinary review was able to be held (& adjudication dispensed) within 24 hours of the event
Does Hanson not recognise the inconsistency of his own actions? Some hearings take 3-4 days to convene and issue outcomes
The present system stinks, one rule for the less favourable clubs and another rule/interpretation for the "chosen" clubs. In any other sport, such a cras system would be charged with bringing the game into disrepute.
Yes Peacock may have got injured, but this is a physical sport, people do get injured from time to time - Man up!!
Trouble is the league rely on a one man disciplinary committee - Amazing how conveniently the disciplinary review was able to be held (& adjudication dispensed) within 24 hours of the event
Does Hanson not recognise the inconsistency of his own actions? Some hearings take 3-4 days to convene and issue outcomes
The present system stinks, one rule for the less favourable clubs and another rule/interpretation for the "chosen" clubs. In any other sport, such a cras system would be charged with bringing the game into disrepute.
Again I just find whatever Moray sees just completely at odds with my opinion. How that hit is a clip. He has hip checked him across half peacocks hips and his forward motion spun him. Nasty hit and injury to take but legal. To levy three matches on that. Again just bizarre interpretation. As with all things EIHL the officiating of physical hockey is again short of standard. I honestly think the discipline needs to be a three man panel of one ref and two former players.