Blaze v Giants Tonight

Tyke Devil

Active Member
#41
TinyJM said:
It is good to see that certain members on here know exactly what happened without being there. Impressive!
Hirsch, had to go in to protect Chalmers, the officials weren't interested, and Stewart was continuing to punch the kid while he was on the ice! Yes Hirsch's penalty is correct as he was third man in, but he had to be, otherwise the kid could of got seriously hurt! Egeners penalty was correct (Well it was called for fighting, but he left the bench so it is correct) as were Olsons and Leebs. Olson should of known it was his 3rd fight(was his 2nd, but carson classed a dropped glove as a fighting major!) and Leeb should know he can't react the way he did, even if the 2 handed whack to his legs could of ended his season.

The fact is when the ref doesn't control the game, quite often in this league, the players take it into their own hands, not just coventry players, they all do it!
The penaltys were correct, apart from Stewart should of got chucked, but this wouldn't of happened if Carson wasn't running the Carson show and actually reffing the game.
Again....just loving the irony of these posts. "Ref's can't control games" and this is what happens? Didn't seem to be so much the case when the skate was on the other foot.

:lol:
 
#42
Tyke Devil said:
TinyJM said:
It is good to see that certain members on here know exactly what happened without being there. Impressive!
Hirsch, had to go in to protect Chalmers, the officials weren't interested, and Stewart was continuing to punch the kid while he was on the ice! Yes Hirsch's penalty is correct as he was third man in, but he had to be, otherwise the kid could of got seriously hurt! Egeners penalty was correct (Well it was called for fighting, but he left the bench so it is correct) as were Olsons and Leebs. Olson should of known it was his 3rd fight(was his 2nd, but carson classed a dropped glove as a fighting major!) and Leeb should know he can't react the way he did, even if the 2 handed whack to his legs could of ended his season.

The fact is when the ref doesn't control the game, quite often in this league, the players take it into their own hands, not just coventry players, they all do it!
The penaltys were correct, apart from Stewart should of got chucked, but this wouldn't of happened if Carson wasn't running the Carson show and actually reffing the game.
Again....just loving the irony of these posts. "Ref's can't control games" and this is what happens? Didn't seem to be so much the case when the skate was on the other foot.

:lol:
Actually if you read my previous posts you will see I said I didn't agree with some of the penaltys and lack of penaltys handed out from what happened in Cardiff :lol:
 

KaneDevils

Well-Known Member
#43
Tyke Devil said:
TinyJM said:
It is good to see that certain members on here know exactly what happened without being there. Impressive!
Hirsch, had to go in to protect Chalmers, the officials weren't interested, and Stewart was continuing to punch the kid while he was on the ice! Yes Hirsch's penalty is correct as he was third man in, but he had to be, otherwise the kid could of got seriously hurt! Egeners penalty was correct (Well it was called for fighting, but he left the bench so it is correct) as were Olsons and Leebs. Olson should of known it was his 3rd fight(was his 2nd, but carson classed a dropped glove as a fighting major!) and Leeb should know he can't react the way he did, even if the 2 handed whack to his legs could of ended his season.

The fact is when the ref doesn't control the game, quite often in this league, the players take it into their own hands, not just coventry players, they all do it!
The penaltys were correct, apart from Stewart should of got chucked, but this wouldn't of happened if Carson wasn't running the Carson show and actually reffing the game.
Again....just loving the irony of these posts. "Ref's can't control games" and this is what happens? Didn't seem to be so much the case when the skate was on the other foot. :lol:
You can't beat irony in sport, it's simply wonderful, but also wonderfully
predictable.
 
#44
TinyJM said:
It is good to see that certain members on here know exactly what happened without being there. Impressive!
Hirsch, had to go in to protect Chalmers, the officials weren't interested, and Stewart was continuing to punch the kid while he was on the ice! Yes Hirsch's penalty is correct as he was third man in, but he had to be, otherwise the kid could of got seriously hurt! Egeners penalty was correct (Well it was called for fighting, but he left the bench so it is correct) as were Olsons and Leebs. Olson should of known it was his 3rd fight(was his 2nd, but carson classed a dropped glove as a fighting major!) and Leeb should know he can't react the way he did, even if the 2 handed whack to his legs could of ended his season.

The fact is when the ref doesn't control the game, quite often in this league, the players take it into their own hands, not just coventry players, they all do it!
The penaltys were correct, apart from Stewart should of got chucked, but this wouldn't of happened if Carson wasn't running the Carson show and actually reffing the game.
Far too many people blaming the ref and not our total lack of discipline at some ends. Every player in the league knows you can't talk to Carson in a disrespectful way, let alone call him a f*****g embarrassment at a volume so high I heard it from behind the glass at the opposite end of the rink. Leeb lost it and some Blaze players stood back and watched as he went nuts instead of hauling him into the box to calm down. He's one of the best players to ever wear the jersey and can do nothing from the dressing room!

Olson had already had two fights. It doesn't matter a jot if his 'second fight' was not actually a fight (barely a 2 min roughing call). The fact is he'd served two 5 minute fighting majors already. Keefe had him hook, line and sinker. No problem with what Egener or Hirsch did - both did what they had to do and accepted their penalties. Leeb and Olson should have known better.

Carson wasn't all that bad for me. He missed the initial slash on Leeb but it was off the play. While Stewart was pounding on Chalmers, Carson was halfway up the ice and would likely not have seen it very well if at all. Stewart may well get a match ban if the incident is reviewed but it won't affect us now. The fact is that he tossed the goalie, star forward, 2nd D-man and tough guy at home against the league champions causing us to lose the game. He was never going to be popular but it doesn't make him wrong.
 

Tyke Devil

Active Member
#45
TinyJM said:
Tyke Devil said:
TinyJM said:
It is good to see that certain members on here know exactly what happened without being there. Impressive!
Hirsch, had to go in to protect Chalmers, the officials weren't interested, and Stewart was continuing to punch the kid while he was on the ice! Yes Hirsch's penalty is correct as he was third man in, but he had to be, otherwise the kid could of got seriously hurt! Egeners penalty was correct (Well it was called for fighting, but he left the bench so it is correct) as were Olsons and Leebs. Olson should of known it was his 3rd fight(was his 2nd, but carson classed a dropped glove as a fighting major!) and Leeb should know he can't react the way he did, even if the 2 handed whack to his legs could of ended his season.

The fact is when the ref doesn't control the game, quite often in this league, the players take it into their own hands, not just coventry players, they all do it!
The penaltys were correct, apart from Stewart should of got chucked, but this wouldn't of happened if Carson wasn't running the Carson show and actually reffing the game.
Again....just loving the irony of these posts. "Ref's can't control games" and this is what happens? Didn't seem to be so much the case when the skate was on the other foot.

:lol:
Actually if you read my previous posts you will see I said I didn't agree with some of the penaltys and lack of penaltys handed out from what happened in Cardiff :lol:
Wasn't a dig at you mate...more that when the majority of the guys on the Inferno were complaining that everything stemmed from poor officiating we tended to get the "Yeah...the Ref missed them...go speak to him/them..not our problem"

You will also find that the majority here do/did not have an issue with the bans handed to the Cardiff players (although the one match, three match, no one match..no three match thing grated a bit).

As much as it annoys me to say it, given the rule book as it stands then there was not much else they could do.

Saying that....what we need is the EIHL to take a long look at their "rule" book when it comes down to bans being handed out following these kinds of incidents and an even longer and bigger look at the way the games are controlled by the stripeys.

They actually shouldn't hand out bans based on the evidence they have by video etc. if they don't actually have the full match video and therefore the full picture.

Doesn't the Toronto centre have the full videos of all the EIHL games? ;)

Still though...really looking forward the next Devils v Blaze Game...hoping for a full house and a bit of retribution (within the rules of course ;) )
 
#46
Have got a facebook friend (ie not a real friend) who is a sports radio presenter over in Michigan so have asked him what he knows about it ending any time soon.

Will see what he has to say
 
#48
TinyJM said:
It is good to see that certain members on here know exactly what happened without being there. Impressive!
Hirsch, had to go in to protect Chalmers, otherwise the kid could of got seriously hurt!
Yes possibly, but did he? Pure speculation.

TinyJM said:
Leeb should know he can't react the way he did, even if the 2 handed whack to his legs could of ended his season.
More of the same speculation huh? :roll:

TinyJM said:
The penaltys were correct, apart from Stewart should of got chucked, but this wouldn't of happened if Carson wasn't running the Carson show and actually reffing the game.
Hang on, Carson called these penalties during the game, so I'm just wondering what the problem is? Last week Hicks and Darnell couldn't figure out how to call a cab let alone make the right calls during the game hence the shenanigans at the end. Or perhaps what got in the way of a repeat performance by Coventry was Carson doing his job and a Belfast team that was having none of it. :idea:
 

Mooney#16

Well-Known Member
#49
One little bolt on also. I can't see where it lands but Hirsch throws a punch with his blocker when he enters the fight. Now that carries an automatic match penalty for a blocker punch. So in theory Hirsch should have had a game misconduct third man in plus match for a punch with a blocker glove. If the EIHL call it as they should because Carson hasn't called it then its liable for supplemental discipline and I believe three games. Put money of a no show for that in the review.
 
#50
7 mins of video highlights here:

http://www.u.tv/Sport/Giants-bounce-back-against-Coventry/ee1d44bc-4cdb-417b-86b1-4edb3ab95c1d

In all fairness, the fan camera phone video does make it look like Hirsch swings his blocker at the guy, but the video above shows its more a case of Hirsch grabbing the guy around the head with his blocker and catcher ( easier said than done ) and pulling him over rather than him belting the guy with it. He's still a douche bag mind you :roll:
 

DWD

New Member
#53
Before Chalmers and Stewart tussled Hirsh had thrown a blocker punch at Stewart.

Then Stewart v Chalmers happened.

Then Hirsh came in.

Both videos missed the first Blocker punch.
 

A#45

New Member
#54
DWD said:
Before Chalmers and Stewart tussled Hirsh had thrown a blocker punch at Stewart.

Then Stewart v Chalmers happened.

Then Hirsh came in.

Both videos missed the first Blocker punch.
A bit of selective editing there DWD :D
 

Paul Sullivan

Well-Known Member
#57
J.B said:
DWD said:
Both videos missed the first Blocker punch.
Presumably it was recorded on the same video which has Olson butt-ending Max ;)
You are spot on JB. Absolutely 100%. There is no chance in hell that there was any contact to Max by Olsen prior to Max's penalty. Let alone two attempts at his head.

No chance at all.

Or, maybe, the other thing:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZRjyyT3u2w
 
#59
Is that it??! From the look of it, my reports were right. Big hit, perhaps a little late. 2 minutes would be a fair call.
 

Paul Sullivan

Well-Known Member
#60
J.B said:
Is that it??! From the look of it, my reports were right. Big hit, perhaps a little late. 2 minutes would be a fair call.
No drugs test to join the inferno any more? Shame.

Get real JB. Anyone that knows the game knows a skill guy like Max doesn't take on a guy like Olsen for a fair hit, however big. All aspects of those clips show contact to the head of Max.

Jog on.
 
Top