better defence
- Thread starter daz
- Start date
In the same way as we put new members off by jumping on them like a sack of spuds?
In truth, and I know I'm not alone here, more than once this season I have had a recurring thought. With supposedly the best nettie in the league, and an already sound defence, plus the addition of Richardson, are we letting in a few too many?
In recent years I think our passing out of our zone hasn't always been particularly good and have given up bad turnovers as a result. Could this be a reason for a slightly leaky D? The caps went to the NIC and let in 1, winning 2-1. We went there a week or 2 before and lost 5-0?
perhaps it's a question of tactics? Debate don't dispel
In truth, and I know I'm not alone here, more than once this season I have had a recurring thought. With supposedly the best nettie in the league, and an already sound defence, plus the addition of Richardson, are we letting in a few too many?
In recent years I think our passing out of our zone hasn't always been particularly good and have given up bad turnovers as a result. Could this be a reason for a slightly leaky D? The caps went to the NIC and let in 1, winning 2-1. We went there a week or 2 before and lost 5-0?
perhaps it's a question of tactics? Debate don't dispel
KaneDevils said:
In the same way as we put new members off by jumping on them like a sack of spuds?
In truth, and I know I'm not alone here, more than once this season I have had a recurring thought. With supposedly the best nettie in the league, and an already sound defence, plus the addition of Richardson, are we letting in a few too many?
In recent years I think our passing out of our zone hasn't always been particularly good and have given up bad turnovers as a result. Could this be a reason for a slightly leaky D? The caps went to the NIC and let in 1, winning 2-1. We went there a week or 2 before and lost 5-0?
perhaps it's a question of tactics? Debate don't dispel
In truth, and I know I'm not alone here, more than once this season I have had a recurring thought. With supposedly the best nettie in the league, and an already sound defence, plus the addition of Richardson, are we letting in a few too many?
In recent years I think our passing out of our zone hasn't always been particularly good and have given up bad turnovers as a result. Could this be a reason for a slightly leaky D? The caps went to the NIC and let in 1, winning 2-1. We went there a week or 2 before and lost 5-0?
perhaps it's a question of tactics? Debate don't dispel
this forum is shocking just for the people who gang up on new memebers who have a different oppinion to be fair everyone has an opinion just respect it i can see what both sides are saying but come on 3 players down what you expect.. imagine manchester united without van persie carrick or giggs or in ice hockey terms penguins without crosby malkin or letang
KaneDevils said:
In the same way as we put new members off by jumping on them like a sack of spuds?
In truth, and I know I'm not alone here, more than once this season I have had a recurring thought. With supposedly the best nettie in the league, and an already sound defence, plus the addition of Richardson, are we letting in a few too many?
In recent years I think our passing out of our zone hasn't always been particularly good and have given up bad turnovers as a result. Could this be a reason for a slightly leaky D? The caps went to the NIC and let in 1, winning 2-1. We went there a week or 2 before and lost 5-0?
perhaps it's a question of tactics? Debate don't dispel
In truth, and I know I'm not alone here, more than once this season I have had a recurring thought. With supposedly the best nettie in the league, and an already sound defence, plus the addition of Richardson, are we letting in a few too many?
In recent years I think our passing out of our zone hasn't always been particularly good and have given up bad turnovers as a result. Could this be a reason for a slightly leaky D? The caps went to the NIC and let in 1, winning 2-1. We went there a week or 2 before and lost 5-0?
perhaps it's a question of tactics? Debate don't dispel
I'm with you on that one. We do have a tendency to fire the puck around the boards and more often than not, it seems to land on the stick of our opponent. I know it does sometimes work and I know that sometimes it's the only way out of a situation but I'm not sure I like that tactic too much.
Maybe it's just me.......