Unfortunately Swarley, I must disagree.
Although the statement was indeed clear, simple and straightforward, there is some difficulty in justifiably assigning to it the fourth of the epithets he applied to his statement, in as much as the precise correlation between the information he communicated and the facts, insofar as they can be determined and demonstrated, in such as to cause epistemological problems of sufficient magnitude as to lay upon the logical and semantic resources of the English language a heavier burden than they can be reasonably expected to bear.
In other words, it absolute bollocks!