James said:
DWD said:
And the fact your team dont cite it, despite your team having closer on ice video coverage than any other in the league, should be evidence enough to your mistaken assessment 
Tylor ban appealed!!
- Thread starter zoesdevil
- Start date
Probably because for every dirty play in a game there are 2 or 3 times that amount cause by Finny alone.
chris592 said:
Probably because for every dirty play in a game there are 2 or 3 times that amount cause by Finny alone.
The consequence of Giants organisatiom winging and causing Tyler's 5 match ban might backfire on them.
They were already in a comfortable position regarding Challenge Cup but surely it would be to their advantage if we were full strength for our two games against Sheffield. Should Sheffield win both weekend games against Devils the gap between Belfast and Sheffield will be hard to close. Should Devils win both then that bunches us up. If you were a Giants fan which situation suits you best?
They were already in a comfortable position regarding Challenge Cup but surely it would be to their advantage if we were full strength for our two games against Sheffield. Should Sheffield win both weekend games against Devils the gap between Belfast and Sheffield will be hard to close. Should Devils win both then that bunches us up. If you were a Giants fan which situation suits you best?
chris592 said:
You won't hear me bitching if a Giants player gets a justified ban, the rules are the rules, so if the Devils want to ask for a review than go ahead.
Anyway we have Cook to step into his skates while Kaspers is serving his ban
Anyway we have Cook to step into his skates while Kaspers is serving his ban
Shame really. As I wasn't arsey. I think it was a pretty constructive email asking for clarification on the mandatory rule as it isn't clear with at least 3 incidents this season.
Hope he does get time to reply to my email as I'd love to hear the response. I've got a feeling I won't get one back as there is no answer as to why this is happening other than making it up as you go along.
Hope he does get time to reply to my email as I'd love to hear the response. I've got a feeling I won't get one back as there is no answer as to why this is happening other than making it up as you go along.
Haha, dry your eyes son.
From my view of it, it was nothing different to you have seen in many games this season, nothing but a but a kick back.
However because of the Michel incident and how Devils fans feel hard done by, they are reffing any of these as bans.
Meanwhile portraying your own team as one that "plays by the rules on all occasions" is, if you dont mind me saying, incredibly one eyed.
You dont cite it, not because you're belief in the morality of the game, but because it wasnt worth citing. Simple
From my view of it, it was nothing different to you have seen in many games this season, nothing but a but a kick back.
However because of the Michel incident and how Devils fans feel hard done by, they are reffing any of these as bans.
Meanwhile portraying your own team as one that "plays by the rules on all occasions" is, if you dont mind me saying, incredibly one eyed.
You dont cite it, not because you're belief in the morality of the game, but because it wasnt worth citing. Simple
DWD - Perhaps you can explain the inconsistency in adjudications that the EIHL hand out? You seem to have a handle of authority (albeit condescending) of what goes on. It would seem that Mr French has neither the common decency or professionalism to explain the reasoning behind his decisions - or perhaps he is still trying to think why he has handed out such a totally dissproportionate and inconsistent suspension to Michel.