That's the spirit. Ignore everything I have said and go on the name calling again.
What we need is the data and evidence that Todd has to be made public in a sensible way.
All we have at the moment is the TAG report produced for the Welsh Government back in Nov 2020.
Since then arenas have opened around the world, ice rinks have opened up in England and parts of Scotland, and the EIHL Series was run without a single positive case.
There should be enough evidence based data amongst that to put forward a sensible argument as to why ice venues are not the high risk environment they were previously deemed to be.
I guess for some people though they will have to decide which is more important. The future of the Arena or their own political points-scoring.
The TAG report needs an informed critique if that is what WG is relying on - even that is not certain. One thing is certain is that the report focuses a lot on outdoor/pop up rinks
There should though be plenty of current data about - yes the incidents in England but excluding the EIHL series which was held in a bubble so is unrepresentative. There should also be historic data - for example from the Arena accident book and ticketing system + nos of visiting players, patch subscriptions etc - the number of A&E visits per head of attendees can be arrived at to, hopefully, debunk the non-Covid pressure on A&E (say March 2019 to March 2020)
Whether we (or the club) can provide like for like data from other countries is debatable as is whether it is relevant
Also historic or real world data does not seem to count at the moment - everything is based on forward modelling which by definition, and at best, is flawed. There also appears (not surprisingly) a lot of emotion about. Just look at today's spat between Greater Manchester and Scotland
So, we should support Todd in his endeavours. We need to be careful what we wish for - Todd will have talked to WG about viable capacity whereas our plea to just hope up could result in - "there you go then get on with it" only for Todd to reject the inevitable opening with restrictions on viability grounds.
You are right focus is needed - the perfect petition would have been better based on how it would help Todd and what it can add. I'm sorry to, say were I FM I would reject the petition on the grounds that it ignores Deeside when he is taking a whole of Wales approach. Nevertheless we should support it. Similarly I would support a protest outside the Senedd but an organised one bringing to the fore Labour touch points in Comets, Huskies and juniors
All this, appart from the petition, is in the ether at the moment. To take things forward we do need advise nd guidance from Todd